Gitea runs on an aarch64 host, and Flutter cannot build an Android APK on a
Linux arm64 host at all: the SDK ships no arm64-host gen_snapshot
(flutter/flutter#189724, #75864, open as of July 2026). So CI for this repo was
failing for two independent reasons, and fixing the runner's container network
would only have exposed the second. An x86_64 runner is a requirement here, not
a preference.
Registers at android-stuff org scope rather than repo scope, so any Android
repo in the org can use the same runner, and labels it by capability
(flutter-android) rather than by hostname, so the workflow does not encode
which machine happens to provide it.
Host mode rather than a container: the machine already has a proven Flutter,
JDK and Android SDK/NDK, so jobs build with the same toolchain that produced
the verified release and skip a per-run NDK download. The trade is isolation,
which the header states plainly — workflows run as that user on that machine.
Refuses to register unless the toolchain it would advertise is actually
present, so a missing SDK fails at setup with a list rather than inside every
later job.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
mikkeli
66826bbce6