wip: foundation complete, paused before phase 2

Phase 1 fully executed and verified (9/9 must-haves).
Ready to resume with Phase 2 (Provider Migration).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mikkeli Matlock
2026-02-09 21:58:56 +09:00
parent 8e3ad7f00c
commit 5c9f3d225e
2 changed files with 85 additions and 5 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
---
phase: 01-foundation
task: complete
total_tasks: 5 (3 in plan 01, 2 in plan 02)
status: phase_complete
last_updated: 2026-02-09T22:15:00Z
---
<current_state>
Phase 1 (Foundation) is fully complete. Both plans executed, verified (9/9 must-haves passed), committed, and documented. The project is at the boundary between Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Branch: feature/gps-manager-architecture
Last commit: 8e3ad7f docs(01): complete foundation phase
</current_state>
<completed_work>
**Plan 01-01: Infrastructure, Logger, Constants, Models (12.8 min)**
- Task 1: Directory structure (screens/, widgets/, providers/, models/, config/), Logger utility, 3 constants files (GpsConfig, TimingConfig, OverlayConfig)
- Task 2: SpeedUnit and ColorThemes moved to config/, ProcessedGpsData/OverlayMessage/ThemeModel extracted to models/
- Task 3: All imports rewired, 106+ print/customDebugPrint calls replaced with Logger, old files deleted
- Commits: 2b2fc8f, 5122be4, a0d93d7
**Plan 01-02: Screen Extraction (6.8 min)**
- Task 1: SpeedometerScreen (802 lines) extracted to screens/speedometer_screen.dart
- Task 2: OverlaySpeedometer (303 lines) extracted to screens/overlay_screen.dart, main.dart slimmed to 39 lines
- Non-blocking checkpoint: Physical device regression testing recommended (not yet performed)
- Commits: bc36076, ad077d1
**Phase completion:**
- Verification: 9/9 must-haves passed (01-VERIFICATION.md)
- Requirements ORG-01 through ORG-08 marked Complete in REQUIREMENTS.md
- ROADMAP.md, STATE.md updated
- Commit: 8e3ad7f
</completed_work>
<remaining_work>
**Optional before Phase 2:**
- [ ] Physical device regression test (non-blocking checkpoint from 01-02)
- [ ] Consider analysis_options.yaml to suppress SCREAMING_SNAKE lint warnings (21 info-level)
**Phase 2: Provider Migration (not yet planned)**
- Replace setState with Provider pattern for reactive state management
- Requirements: STATE-01 through STATE-07
- Depends on Phase 1 (satisfied)
- Expected: 2-3 plans
- HIGH RISK: Async lifecycle complexity needs pre-audit
</remaining_work>
<decisions_made>
- SCREAMING_SNAKE naming for behavioral constants (GpsConfig, TimingConfig, OverlayConfig)
- Logger utility with 4 severity levels replaces all print()/customDebugPrint() globally
- OverlayMessage typed class for IPC instead of raw Maps (toMap/fromMap serialization)
- ThemeModel delegates palette storage to ColorThemes (separation of concerns)
- Layer-first directory structure (screens/, widgets/, providers/, models/, config/, services/)
- main.dart as pure entry point (39 lines — main(), overlayMain(), SpeedoApp only)
</decisions_made>
<blockers>
None. Phase 1 clean. Phase 2 has known risks documented in STATE.md:
- HIGH RISK: 5+ async patterns in SpeedometerScreen need audit before provider migration
- GpsDataManager singleton disposal strategy needs design decision
- Manual regression testing checklist should be created before Phase 2
</blockers>
<context>
The monolithic main.dart (1,133 lines) has been decomposed into a clean modular structure. The app compiles with zero errors (22 info-level warnings, 21 of which are intentional SCREAMING_SNAKE convention). No behavior was changed — this was purely structural.
The codebase is now ready for Phase 2's Provider migration. The key challenge will be threading Provider through the existing async patterns: GPS stream subscription, overlay lifecycle management, timer-based heartbeats, and widget lifecycle observers. SpeedometerScreen alone has 5+ async patterns that need careful handling during the migration.
Phase 3 (Overlay) and Phase 4 (GPS) both depend on Phase 2 but are independent of each other — they could potentially run in parallel after Phase 2 completes.
</context>
<next_action>
Resume with: `/gsd:discuss-phase 2` or `/gsd:plan-phase 2`
The discuss step is recommended because Phase 2 has HIGH RISK async complexity. Gathering context first (auditing async patterns, deciding GpsDataManager disposal strategy) will produce better plans.
</next_action>